ECJ ruled: Red Bull cannot protect its colour combination mark

Veröffentlicht am: 1. December, 2017

The Austrian beverage giant Red Bull cannot have a combination of blue and silver protected as a colour trademark. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) confirmed yesterday nullity of its registered colour Community trade mark.

Red BullThe case of Red Bull versus EUIPO and Optimum Mark was negotiated (Case T-101/15 and T 102/15). The dispute centres on the registered Community trade mark No. 2 534 774, a representation of the colours blue and silver, which is registered on the applicant Red Bull GmbH. The Polish company Optimum Mark filed an action for annulment against this registration of the colour mark, which Red Bull fought against. Yesterday, the European Court of Justice has now confirmed that Red Bull cannot protect its colour combination mark.

The case has already been tried several times

  • October 2013: Decision of the Cancellation Division deciding that the colour mark is invalid because it is devoid of distinctive character in accordance with Article 7 (1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.
  • December 2014: The First Board of Appeal upholds the invalidity of the colour mark
  • April 2015: Red Bull appeals (Case T-101/15)

ECJ confirms nullity of colour mark

In the description of the brand, Red Bull only listed the two colours and a ratio of about 50:50, a court spokesman was quoted in a short article in the Bildzeitung. But that is not enough from the point of view of the court. For a clearly distinguishable colour mark, a more precise description of the composition is necessary.

In addition, there is the question of systematic arrangement, which can also play an important role for color marks, especially for color combinations. The display of a systematic arrangement may be necessary if this arrangement is not visible from the graphical representation.

The Court dismissed the action and upheld the Board of Appeal’s decision. Red Bull may appeal the decision.

Registration of colour marks in German law is often difficult

Abstract colour marks are generally devoid of distinctive character and are therefore not registrable under Section 8.2 Nr. 1 MarkenG because the addressed trade regularly perceives a colour as a decorative element and not as a product label.

However, an original distinctive character of an abstract colour mark can be assumed if:
1. a very specific market affecting only a limited range of goods would be affected
2. the use of these colours in this market is either unusual at all or at least the specific colour is extremely unusual.
3. the traffic is accustomed to the use of colours as a marking agent in the long term through appropriate industry practice


Do you need a patent attorney to defend your trademark against potential infringement?

Our attorneys are experienced in all areas of intellectual property and can help you wherever you need a professional. Contact us now to recieve a non-binding call-back from our attorneys.



Curia T 101/15


noelsch / / CCO License  

Related Posts

28. January 2019

The colour purple from the international confectionery manufacturer Cadbury cannot be split as a trademark in the UK. The British Court of Appeal rejected Cadbury's altered trademark application for "Color Purple" in December. This judgment...

read more
31. December 2018

We are looking forward to next year's judgments and to taking a look at the most recent references for a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice in the coming year. Important judgments from the entire spectrum of patent and trademark law...

read more
4. October 2018

In today's judgment, the European Court annulled the previous decision of both the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO declaring the EU trade mark FLÜGEL invalid for the goods "alcoholic beverages (except beer)" and "alcoholic...

read more
Kontakt / Contact
close slider